Comments 23

Re: "You Can't Rule Out The Possibility That Executives Are Idiots" - John Carmack On Microsoft's Gutting Of id Software

81632bit

If the revenues generated by Doom The Dark ages were not what MS wanted, then I'd say their expectations were too high. It was a well reviewed, and sold reasonably well (c. 800k copies).

Sticking it on Game Pass day 1 probably took a big chunk of potential PC & Xbox purchasers out of the equation, given they reported 3m players. MS still don't seem to have grasped that putting major "AAA" titles on GP day 1 will hurt the revenue delivered by that game on one, if not 2 formats (Xbox & PC).

Re: Commodore Says Response To Callback 8020 Has "Surpassed Expectations" As Use Of GenAI Continues To Cause Concern

81632bit

"fund R&D"...

This is an off the peg phone with some customisations. Plenty of companies in Shenzhen will do that if you order enough units.

Because there is no way that this phone (given it's proposed Oct/Nov delivery date) has been designed, sampled, tested, and secured the relevant FCC/UKCA/etc regulatory certificates in 18 or so months. Even the big boys like Samsung (with their huge R&D budgets) need longer than that to get a handset from idea to customers.

Re: Talking Point: "We, The Consumers, Need To Vote With Our Wallets" - The Moral Dilemma Of Supporting SNK In 2026

81632bit

I would suggest that some people are "irritated" because they are uncomfortable with their lack of basic empathy for those who suffer at the hands of SNKs owners being so publicly shamed.

It's easy to say "I don't care about XYZ" until someone else points out the bad things you "don't care" about. Then it gets awkward. It makes you look... cruel.

But hey, shouldn't lecture people about their choices, right? I mean, what has that ever achieved? It's not as if pointing out facts can change people's opinions is it?

Re: Talking Point: "We, The Consumers, Need To Vote With Our Wallets" - The Moral Dilemma Of Supporting SNK In 2026

81632bit

@Sketcz If I was to stop reading this site, it would be because of the pathetic, childish rant that the site editorial team decided to delete that you left earlier calling those of us who disagreed with you "sanctimonious virtue signallers".

You don't get to "play nice" now. We see your moral emptiness, and your "me, me, me" attitude. You don't care about who is behind what you buy, or what abhorrent things they do. As long as you get yours, right? That's all that matters, yeah?

There are bigger, and more important things in the world that any one persons "personal joy". But I don't think you quite understand that, do you?

Re: Talking Point: "We, The Consumers, Need To Vote With Our Wallets" - The Moral Dilemma Of Supporting SNK In 2026

81632bit

"Don't bring politics into gaming! Gaming isn't political!"

Erm, yes it is when countries like Saudi Arabia (who have a terrible human rights record) start to buy into the gaming space. Ever hear of a thing called "soft power"? It's how countries buy influence, often through seemingly innocuous ways, like SA buying games companies, or China building vital infrastructure in impoverished African nations.

Politics affects every single aspect of our day to day lives. Anyone who says they "don't do politics" is a liar. The tax you pay? Politics. The countries you buy stuff from? Politics. The media you consume? Politics.

Not everyone likes to feign ignorance and allow themselves to make choices without considering the moral implications of them. Some of us are actively engaged.

Oh, and to those looking for a "politics free" gaming site.... good luck. Most of the one that claim that are almost always made by and for those who think "Gamergate" was a fuss over nothing... and that is most definitely a political position.