@Damo yeah ..okay. I wonder how many artists who are self-taught paid the artists they taught themselves using their artwork with? I wonder how many of the posts that you quoted here for your article which is pretty much the majority of your article discussing what everybody else said, did you pay them for the content that you built around their content? I guess you are going to share the ad revenue from this website and your article with the reddit posters you used to populate your article.
Humans have been doing this very same thing since humans existed. Ai does not copy AI learns the semantic relationship between words and a whole lot of things. It's not a copy of something any more than a human drawing, something that it looks similar to someone else's artwork because that's how they learned.
If you actually understood how AI worked and didn't just have a dunning-kruger understanding of it, maybe your articles would be a little bit better and not have to rely on third parties writing to fill the opinion space.
Let us get to the core issue here though. AI will not replace artists. What it will replace are a career path that is not art. It is the production of assets. If you want to be a artist and you're a good artist, people will buy your art regardless of the abilities of artificial intelligence.
I mean for decades now we've been able to 3D print, not 3D printers, but 3D printing of actual printing, artwork with brush strokes that mimic the original art.
Sure it might cost $90 and not several million but somebody is still going to pay several million for Van Gogh's original piece over a 3D textured brushstroke print of starry night.
Because that's art. I make music, I don't even care if anybody listens to it. I make it because I enjoy making it. I've been making music for two decades. Now. I make it because I enjoy making it. Because it's an art form that I enjoy working in. Maybe people would listen to it. I don't care. I care about making it because it's art. It's my hobby. I work on an ambulance. AI is not taking that away from me. And if it did good because more people will survive. But the reality is that art can't be taken away because it's something someone wants to do, as a career path. Even if people loved my music I think the moment that I was expected to create it, it would cease being what it is.
Now I will come to the table about one thing, rare Earth component shortages , I don't like that. I can't afford a stick of ram without winning the lottery at my fry cook of healthcare EMS salary.
That is a problem. If an algorithm suddenly needed wheat to run, bread would cost $50 a loaf and the government would be stepping in by Tuesday. But because the what AI consumes are silicon and rare earth metals, the market is just letting the titans feast while everyone else starves for basic hardware. That should be addressed. But I'm not going to hold my breath. At least when some of the stupid AI grifters bubble pops and they crumble, and will be able to feast on their remains.
Comments 1
Re: "You Cannot Claim Ignorance" - Myst Co-Creator Under Fire For Using GenAI Art In Riven Soundtrack Release
@Damo yeah ..okay. I wonder how many artists who are self-taught paid the artists they taught themselves using their artwork with? I wonder how many of the posts that you quoted here for your article which is pretty much the majority of your article discussing what everybody else said, did you pay them for the content that you built around their content? I guess you are going to share the ad revenue from this website and your article with the reddit posters you used to populate your article.
Humans have been doing this very same thing since humans existed. Ai does not copy AI learns the semantic relationship between words and a whole lot of things. It's not a copy of something any more than a human drawing, something that it looks similar to someone else's artwork because that's how they learned.
If you actually understood how AI worked and didn't just have a dunning-kruger understanding of it, maybe your articles would be a little bit better and not have to rely on third parties writing to fill the opinion space.
Let us get to the core issue here though. AI will not replace artists. What it will replace are a career path that is not art. It is the production of assets. If you want to be a artist and you're a good artist, people will buy your art regardless of the abilities of artificial intelligence.
I mean for decades now we've been able to 3D print, not 3D printers, but 3D printing of actual printing, artwork with brush strokes that mimic the original art.
Sure it might cost $90 and not several million but somebody is still going to pay several million for Van Gogh's original piece over a 3D textured brushstroke print of starry night.
Because that's art. I make music, I don't even care if anybody listens to it. I make it because I enjoy making it. I've been making music for two decades. Now. I make it because I enjoy making it. Because it's an art form that I enjoy working in. Maybe people would listen to it. I don't care. I care about making it because it's art. It's my hobby. I work on an ambulance. AI is not taking that away from me. And if it did good because more people will survive. But the reality is that art can't be taken away because it's something someone wants to do, as a career path. Even if people loved my music I think the moment that I was expected to create it, it would cease being what it is.
Now I will come to the table about one thing, rare Earth component shortages , I don't like that. I can't afford a stick of ram without winning the lottery at my fry cook of healthcare EMS salary.
That is a problem. If an algorithm suddenly needed wheat to run, bread would cost $50 a loaf and the government would be stepping in by Tuesday. But because the what AI consumes are silicon and rare earth metals, the market is just letting the titans feast while everyone else starves for basic hardware. That should be addressed. But I'm not going to hold my breath. At least when some of the stupid AI grifters bubble pops and they crumble, and will be able to feast on their remains.